The expert studies and you will advice guide writers in their choices and you can ensure that had written research is legitimate, rigid, and you can credible. Publishers see fellow reviewers primarily because of their into the-breadth expertise in the topic amount otherwise methods of the work they are questioned to check. This expertise is priceless and you will irreplaceable. Fellow writers is accountable for the accuracy and you will views expressed into the the profile, plus the fellow remark techniques operates toward a concept from shared faith anywhere between experts, reviewers and you can publishers. Even after quick advances, generative AI equipment has actually significant constraints: capable lack up-to-big date education and could generate absurd, biased or untrue advice. Manuscripts can also include painful and sensitive otherwise exclusive suggestions which should perhaps not be common beyond your peer comment process. Hence we ask you to, if you are Springer Nature examines providing our very own peer reviewers which have the means to access secure AI tools, fellow reviewers dont publish manuscripts with the generative AI systems.
If any area of the testing of your own states produced in the fresh new manuscript was at any way backed by an enthusiastic AI device, we inquire fellow reviewers in order to claim the utilization of such systems transparently in the fellow comment statement.
Citations
Research content and you will non-look articles (age.g. Thoughts, Opinion, and you can Responses content) must mention suitable and relevant literature to get the fresh claims made. A lot of self-solution, matched operate certainly one of numerous article authors in order to collectively thinking-mention, gratuitous and unnecessary citation of blogs blogged on journal so you’re able to that the report could have been registered, and every other particular solution manipulation are improper.
Violation control will result in the article getting rejected, and may also become claimed so you’re able to authors’ organizations. Also, any efforts by fellow-writers or publishers to prompt such as for instance means might be reported because of the article authors into creator.
- Article writers must look into another guidelines when preparing their manuscript:
- People report throughout the manuscript that relies on exterior types of information (i.elizabeth. maybe not the new authors’ very own brand new records or findings or general studies) is to play with a pass.
- Authors is always to end mentioning derivations out-of unique works. Such as, they have to cite the initial performs rather than an assessment post you to definitely alludes to exclusive works.
- Article writers is to make certain its citations was real (we.elizabeth. they should make sure the citation supporting the fresh new report built in their manuscript and should not misrepresent a separate works because of the citing they in the event the it doesn’t keep the part the newest experts want to generate).
- Article authors cannot cite sources they have maybe not read.
- Authors ought not to preferentially mention their otherwise their friends’, peers’, otherwise institution’s books.
- Article authors is to avoid mentioning work only from nation.
- Experts must avoid using a too much number of citations to support one point.
- Ideally, experts would be to cite sources which have undergone peer opinion in which possible.
- Writers shouldn’t sexy Moldavan filles cite advertisements or advertorial issue.
Preprint discussing and you may admission
BMC publications remind publish from preprints out of number one look manuscripts for the preprint host of your authors’ solutions, authors’ or organization websites, and you will unlock correspondence ranging from experts whether for the neighborhood preprint host or preprint leaving comments platforms.
Preprints is actually identified as a keen author’s sort of research manuscript prior to official peer remark during the a record, that’s deposited towards the a general public machine (as discussed when you look at the Preprints on lifetime sciences. Technology 352, 899901; 2016); preprints tends to be released at any time into the peer remark process. Send out of preprints isnt noticed earlier in the day guide and will not threaten idea at BMC magazines. Manuscripts posted into preprint machine will never be taken into consideration whenever determining the improvement provided with a survey concerned at the a good BMC log.
BMC keeps partnered that have Research Square ( BMC possess many need for Browse Square) to include For the Remark, a journal-included provider to own preprint discussing, help experts all over most of the communities i serve to express its research very early. Article writers entry to some BMC guides are also able to in public express details about their peer feedback as a consequence of When you look at the Review. Standard information about In Opinion at BMC as well as the Browse Square preprint program can be obtained right here and here .
